MAGNET LABS
Start a Lab

Velocity EngineExecution Game

Ownership Architecture

from who decides this?→to I own the next step

The Goal

Name one owner for each outcome that matters, and push the decisions it creates down to the person closest to the work.

Ideal For

Leadership teams where the same decisions keep escalating, matrix organizations with diffuse ownership, post-reorg resets, and scaling teams where the founder has become the bottleneck.

The Shift

From who decides this? to I own the next step.

The Science

When roles are unclear, performance tends to suffer. When responsibility is shared and no one’s contribution can be identified, people tend to put in less effort. Empowering leadership, which shares authority and encourages people to decide, is associated with more creativity and helping behavior, and more modestly with task performance.

Ownership Architecture, step by step

  1. Name the gapRound-robin, senior leader first: “An outcome we keep falling short on, because no one clearly owns it, is…”
  2. Pick the outcomesUp to three outcomes for the next quarter or two that need coordination across roles and are slowed by unclear ownership. Outcomes, not tasks.
  3. Name one DRIOne name per outcome, who owns progress and decisions. Test it: “If this fails, who feels it first, and who must act?” No one is named in their absence.
  4. Sort the ladderList the decisions one outcome creates and sort them: L1 decide alone (the default), L2 decide and inform, L3 requires approval. Every L3 needs a reason; move at least one decision down a rung.
  5. Give one backEach senior leader names one decision they will stop taking back: “When [decision] comes to me, I will send it back to [DRI].”
  6. Commit and reviewEach DRI writes an if-then for the decisions they now make. Book a 30-day ladder review and look for fewer escalations, faster decisions and fewer decisions reopened.

The techniques, and why they work

Name one DRI per outcome

One name, not a team, who owns progress and decisions, tested with “If this fails, who feels it first, and who must act?” When responsibility is shared, people tend to put in less effort, and unclear roles tend to go with lower performance.

Sort the decision ladder

Sort the decisions an outcome creates into L1 decide alone, L2 decide and inform, and L3 requires approval; default to L1 and give every L3 a reason. Empowering leadership is associated with more creativity and helping behavior.

Commit both sides

Each DRI writes an if-then for the decisions they now make, and each senior leader names one decision they will send back; the ladder is reviewed in 30 days. If-then plans tend to turn intentions into action.

Selected research

From the research

The thinking behind this lab, published in full:

Related labs

Run this lab with your team Try it first: 60-Minute Challenge LabBrowse all labs